FDA vs LFGB: 5 Critical Differences for Food Tinplate Cans
FDA vs LFGB: 5 Critical Differences for Food Tinplate Cans
2025-07-30
We specialize in helping packaging clients meet global food safety standards. Below, we break down the 5 key differences between FDA (US) and LFBG (EU) regulations for tinplate food cans — so you can sell globally with confidence.
Table of Contents ▲
1. Quick Answer
2. 5 Critical Differences Between FDA & LFBG
3. How to Comply With Both Standards
4. Quick Recap
Quick Answer
FDA (US) and LFBG (EU) have 5 key differences for tinplate food cans: coating migration limits, testing methods, labeling requirements, tin content rules, and approval processes — but with targeted adjustments, you can meet both.
Use coatings with migration limits ≤10ppm (meets LFBG; exceeds FDA requirements)
Test with LFBG’s 3+ food simulants (covers FDA’s worst-case tests)
Add LFBG-required labels (accepted in the US)
Limit tin content to 200ppm (meets both standards)
Complete third-party testing (satisfies LFBG; supports FDA self-certification).
Quick Recap
FDA and LFBG differ in coating limits, testing, labeling, tin content, and approval — but by aligning with the stricter LFBG requirements, you can create tinplate cans that comply with both US and EU food safety rules.